The Chicago Cubs are engaged in a legal battle with Wrigley View Rooftop, a private rooftop venue overlooking Wrigley Field. This dispute stems from a broader history of rooftop view rights and previous settlements made two decades ago. The Cubs have filed a lawsuit alleging misappropriation, false advertising, unjust enrichment, unfair competition, and unauthorized use of trademarks. Wrigley Rooftop countersued, claiming private nuisance and asserting their right to use their property as they see fit.
The core issue revolves around property rights versus intellectual property. Wrigley Rooftop argues it’s entitled to profit from its view without Cubs interference, provided it does not misuse Cubs branding. The Cubs contend that the venue profits off the Cubs’ product and creates a commercial experience that can confuse consumers into thinking it’s officially affiliated.
The discussion touches on broader implications, such as how new stadiums are now designed to prevent similar conflicts, usually by enclosing the structure or controlling nearby development. While the revenue impact for the Cubs is likely minimal, the case may be pursued on principle and to set legal precedent.
The conversation concludes by emphasizing that Wrigley View Rooftop may have a strong case based on property rights, but could still face penalties if there’s any unauthorized use of the Cubs’ trademarks